Russian Professor Predicts U.S. Collapse like Soviet Union of 1976
Russian Professor Predicts U.S. Collapse like Soviet Union of 1976
Regarding the following:
The prediction may not be so
far-fetched. If Democrats and Barack Obama persist in their alienation
of people of faith, including Obama's promise to pass FOCA (Freedom of
Choice Act) which would wipe out all gains made against the slaughter of
innocent unborn children and doctors, nurses and other health care
workers are forced to kill, or partake in the killing of unborn children
against their will, you will see a Civil war in the United States.
In
the Civil War over slavery, Abraham Lincoln started a war to hold the
country together. Now, 4,000 children are killed every day in their
mother's womb -- 1.3 million every year. This is far worse than the
events that led up to the Civil war. Some states will try to secede from
the Union and for good reason -- the red states.
The blue
states will be the home of the baby killers and all those who say women
should have the right to have their children killed, the pornographers,
homosexuals and all others who do not believe in God, or the contents of
the Holy Scriptures.
I also predict that many people living in
the blue states will want to relocate to one of the red states, because
their children will be so indoctrinated in homosexuality, "red-light
districts" will be everywhere and the crime rate will run amok. People
will want to be around the religious.
And the person who will be
solely responsible for this will be the socialist, Barack Hussein Obama,
who is the closest thing to the anti-Christ we have in our country.
Write
this down. It may not happen during my lifetime, but it will happen.
The new Civil War will be a war between good and evil. And if it does
happen during my lifetime, hand me a gun and send me to the front lines.
I will fight to my death to save the lives of the little children and
against the tyranny to force Americans to kill these same children in
our hospitals and to force taxpayers to fund the killings.
As if Things Weren't Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.
In Moscow, Igor Panarin's Forecasts Are All the Rage; America 'Disintegrates' in 2010
By ANDREW OSBORN
MOSCOW
-- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the
U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took
his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a
civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now
he's found an eager audience: Russian state media. [Prof. Panarin]
In
recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his
predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the
attention is going to grow even stronger."
Prof. Panarin, 50
years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of
the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is
invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and
appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.
But
it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the
Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from
instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr.
Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia
is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the
weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go
economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate
territories.
A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr.
Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the
outlook for them is dire.
"There's a 55-45% chance right now that
disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that
process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's
not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more
powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because
it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.
Mr.
Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and
moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of
the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the
U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian
control.
In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which
are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now
being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a
recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top
international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker.
During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut
between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds
of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on
the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.
Mr.
Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of
anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV
journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet
Union."
Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on
the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually
discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the
government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr.
Panarin's theories don't hold water.
Mr. Panarin's résumé
includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top
Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national
pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the
KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a
double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.
The
professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet
Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics,
and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National
Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President
Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."
In
September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to
information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was
there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his
theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.
"When I pushed the
button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated,
hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in
the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."
At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.
He
based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI
analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic
trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the
going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the
federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest
up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split
along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.
California
will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and
will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the
heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to
Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York
will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union.
Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The
Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a
protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.
"It
would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of
the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the
Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from
his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly
grin.
Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he
published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national
dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a
pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's
role as a global financial regulator.
Americans hope
President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when
spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."
The
article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof.
Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline
to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.
For
Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the
answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to
very carefully," he says.
The professor says he's convinced that
people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have
forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites
French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having
rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand.
"When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people
laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin. [Igor Panarin]
Write to Andrew Osborn at andrew.osborn@wsj.com
_______________________________________________
To respond to this email, subscribe, or unsubscribe, please contact Dr. Frank:
Humor: "Cutting Out The Middleman: Dems Will Just Have Trump Debate Biden's Teleprompter Directly"
Babylon Bee humor: Cutting Out The Middleman: Dems Will Just Have Trump Debate Biden's Teleprompter Directly
U.S.—In an attempt to cut out the middleman and not waste everyone's
time, Democrats announced today that they will be taking part in the
debates, but they will just have Trump debate Biden's teleprompter
directly.
The
move is expected to save a lot of time as there won't be long,
rambling, unintelligible rants or completely incoherent sentences coming
from the Democratic candidate.
The teleprompter will display all
of Biden's handlers' carefully worded talking points. Trump will give
his own points and respond to everything displayed on the screen,
translated to audio via text-to-speech for the convenience of the
debaters and the audience... [https://babylonbee.com/news/to-save-time-dems-will-just-have-trump-debate-bidens-teleprompter?utm_content=buffer0d3d5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer]
I have been redeemed by the Cross. Therefore I must cooperate in the
salvation of souls. I can be and I desire to be an apostle in my
sufferings. Tears shed without love are wasted and embitter the soul.
TO weep with love consoles, sanctifies and redeems. No one is nearer
the Crucified King than the friend He crucifies in His mercy. Let us
hasten to open heaven to many souls and to our own soul, let us glorify
the Heart of Jesus by this supreme proof of love. Let us extend and
confirm His reign by the wonderful fruitfullness of this apostolate
which is within the reach of all.
How must I excercise this Apostolate?
1) Offer every day and if possible many times a day,
sufferings, disappointments, contradictions, etc., so as to increase the
treasures of the apostolate which is to purchase souls and families for
the glory of the Heart of Jesus
2) Recite this prayer with great love: Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, through the Immaculate and sorrowful
Heart of Mary, I offet Thee the treasure of all my physical and mental
sufferings, and I praise and thank Thee, O King of Love, in all my
sorrows, asking in exchange the extension of Thy Social Reign. May Thy
Kingdom come by Thy Cross and my crosses! Sacre Heart of Jesus, Thy
Kingdom come!
How shall I join this Apostolate?
Make the following offering: By suffering borne with love and peace of soul, I promise to become
an apostle of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, I offer all my sufferings in
union with the sufferings of Christ for the conversion of souls in my
own family, in the Holy Father’s Missions, and for the Enthronement of
the Sacred Heart in families. [http://www.msgrjohnesseff.net/?page_id=160]
Pray an Our Father now for the
restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the
Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
James Simpson is a Harvard Professor. His entire article can be found at www.americanthinker.com.
Cloward-Piven Government
By James Simpson
It
is time to cast aside all remaining doubt. President Obama is not
trying to lead America forward to recovery, prosperity and strength.
Quite the opposite, in fact.
In September of last year,
American Thinker published my article, "Barack Obama and the Strategy of
Manufactured Crisis". Part of a series, it connected then presidential
candidate Barack Obama to individuals and organizations practicing a
malevolent strategy for destroying our economy and our system of
government. Since then the story of that strategy has found its way
across the blogosphere, onto the airwaves of radio stations across the
country, the Glenn Beck television show, Bill O'Reilly and now Mark
Levin.
The methodology is known as the Cloward-Piven Strategy,
and we can all be grateful to David Horowitz and his Discover the
Networks for originally exposing and explaining it to us. He describes
it as:
The strategy of forcing political change through
orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the
fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a
flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and
economic collapse.
Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven were
two lifelong members of Democratic Socialists of America and taught
sociology at Columbia University (Piven later went on to City University
of New York). In a May, 1966 Nation magazine article titled "The
Weight of the Poor," they outlined their strategy, proposing to use
grassroots radical organizations to push ever more strident demands for
public services at all levels of government.
The result, they
predicted, would be "a profound financial and political crisis" that
would unleash "powerful forces ... For major economic reform at the
national level."
They implemented the Strategy by creating a
succession of radical organizations but most notably the Association of
Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), with the help of veteran
organizer Wade Rathke. Their crowning achievement was the "Motor
Voter" act, signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1993 with Cloward and
Piven standing behind him.
As we now know, ACORN was one of the
chief drivers of high-risk mortgage lending that eventually led to the
financial crisis. But the Motor Voter law was another component of the
strategy. It created vast vulnerabilities in our electoral system which
ACORN then exploited.
ACORN's vote registration scandals throughout the U.S. are predictable fallout.
The
Motor Voter law has also been used to open another vulnerability in the
system: the registration of vast numbers of illegal aliens, who then
vote reliably Democrat. Herein lies the real reason Democrats are so
anxious for open borders, security be damned.
It should be
clear to anyone with a mind and two eyes that this president and this
Congress do not have our interests at heart. They are implementing this
strategy on an unprecedented scale by flooding America with a tidal
wave of poisonous initiatives, orders, regulations and laws. As Rahm
Emmanuel said, "A crisis is a terrible thing to waste."
The
real goal of "healthcare" legislation, the real goal of "cap and trade,"
the real goal of "stimulus" is to rip the guts out of our private
economy and transfer wide swaths of it over to government control. Do
not be deluded by the propaganda. These initiatives are vehicles for
change. They are not goals in and of themselves, except in their
ability to deliver power, and will make matters much worse, for that is
their design.
This time, in addition to overwhelming the
government with demands for services, Obama and the Democrats are
overwhelming political opposition to their plans with a flood of
apocalyptic legislation. Their ultimate goal is to leave us so
discouraged, demoralized and exhausted that we throw our hands up in
defeat. As Barney Frank said "the middle class will be too distracted
to fight."
These people are our enemies. They don't use guns,
yet, but they are just as dangerous, determined and duplicitous as the
communists we faced in the Cold War, Korea, Vietnam and bush wars across
the globe, and the Nazis we faced in World War II.
It is time
we fully internalized and digested this fact, with all its ugly
ramifications. These people have violated countless laws, and could be
prosecuted, had we the political power. Not only are their policies
unconstitutional, but deliberately so - the goal being to make the
Constitution irrelevant. Their spending is off the charts and will
drive us into hyperinflation, but could be rescinded, had we the
political power. These policies are toxic, but could be stopped and
reversed, had we the political power. Their ideologies are poisonous,
but could be exposed for what they are, with long jail sentences as an
object lesson, had we the political power.
Every single citizen
who cares about this country should be spending every minute of his/her
spare time lobbying, organizing, writing and planning. Fight every
initiative they launch. It is all destructive. If we are to root out
this evil, it is critical that in 2010 we win competent, principled
leaders willing to defend our constitution and our country. Otherwise
the malevolent cabal that occupies the seat of government today will
become too entrenched.
I found your article online [Sex-abuse Worldview Vs. Christian Worldview], titled as above in the
subject field. I was very interested in the subject
matter you discussed, the moreso because I myself have been greatly
influenced by Nietzschean ideas (this doesn't mean I'm passionately
anti-christian; only that I tend to fall more on the side of Nietzsche's
way of seeing things, as opposed to the way of traditional
Christianity). I would like to begin a correspondence with you via
email on this topic, as there were some areas you brought up which I
wished to explore further. Some things I would like touch upon are, for
instance, this whole notion of the degree to which Adler was influenced
by Nietzsche. I realize that Adler's ideas on power dynamics were
derived from Nietzsche's philosophy, but I'm not so sure about his ideas
on self-actualization.
Granted, there's a definite intonation in Nietzsche's writings which
rings strongly of something like self-actualization, but could the
similarities here to Adler's theories be mostly a matter of coincidence
(although Munch obviously thinks the contrary)? After all, Adler was
also influenced by Christian thinkers like Dostoevsky, and there are
similarities between Nietzsche's and Dostoevsky's psychological
observations. I was also curious as to what your thoughts were on Soren
Kierkegaard, another Christian thinker who capitalized on notions of
self-actualization. Kierkegaard viewed the process of becoming an
authentic individual as being indispensable to genuine Christianity.
I'm aware that your article was primarily on the loss of Christian
values in American culture, and how this loss seems somehow to be tied
in with this Nietzschean-Freudian-Jungian-Adlerian emphasis on
individuality. To the best of my understanding of Nietzsche, however, he
doesn't consider all values/opinions to be of equal worth. He believed
that vital qualities in a human being determine his choice of values,
as a venu of self-expression. He favored value systems that were
"life-affirming"; a future which is willed is only worth as much as it
is an affirmation of life (i.e., without a vision the people perish).
Individual self-creation also becomes necessary in a world which has
become deprived of meaning after the death of God, insofar as lack of
meaning is life-negating. But Nietzsche's self-creative act is to be
something lofty and reverential, not an exercise of petty narcissism.
When postmodernists speak of a "value-free" ideal in which -- so it
seems to me -- "self-actualization" is in fact an exercise of petty
narcissism, I think what's being represented isn't so much Nietzschean
as it is the product of liberal democracy. The bourgeoisie are, after
all, diminutively selfish creatures who foster the edict, "live and let
live" -- private citizens who are concerned only with their own lives
and how to make themselves "happier". They have little or no social
consciousness. Nietzsche hated democracy as much as he hated
Christianity.
Sincerely, Ken Younos
Mr. Younos,
Below are my reponses to your questions.
WSU Professor Paul Brians disaggrees with you. Please read:
Psychology
The
two grandfathers of modern psychology, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) and
Carl Jung (1875-1961), both had a deep admiration for Nietzsche and
credited him with many insights into the human character.
Alfred Adler (1870-1937) developed an "individual psychology" which
argues that each individual strives for what he called "superiority,"
but is more commonly referred to today as "self-realization" or
"self-actualization," and which was profoundly influenced by Nietzsche's
notions of striving and self-creation. The entire "human potential
movement" and humanistic psychology (Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, Rollo
May, etc.) owes a great debt to this line of thought. Even pop
psychologists of "self-esteem" preach a gospel little different from
that of Zarathustra. The ruthless, self-assertive "objectivism" of Ayn
Rand (1905-1982) is difficult to imagine without the influence of
Nietzsche.
"The more
superior one person is to another whom he loves, the more he will feel
tempted (humanly speaking) to draw the other up to himself, but
(divinely speaking) the more he will feel moved to come down to him.
This is the dialectic of love."
And Nietzsche's:
"Master morality," which was different from Christian morality – or
"slave morality," as he called it. He thought the weak have the morality
of obedience and conformity to the master. Masters have a right to do
whatever they want; since there is no God, everything is permissible.
There is the same difference between Dostoevsky and Nietzsche.
Barrett's Supreme Court: "Arresting People for Attending Church"?
Breitbart reported "Idaho Police Arrest 3 at Outdoor Church Worship":
"Officers arrested Gabriel Rench, Rachel Bohnet, and Sean Bohnet, according to Moscow Report, a local independent news outlet. A video
uploaded to social media shows Bohnet, a local music teacher, and his
wife telling officers they refused to comply with an inaudible order.
Moscow Report says the apparent infraction is that they refused to show
identification."
"Footage of the couple’s arrest shows the church body singing the hymn
“Praise God from Whom All Blessings Flow” as officers place them in
handcuffs." [https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2020/09/24/idaho-police-arrest-3-at-outdoor-church-worship-event-in-defiance-of-mask-mandate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29]
Will an Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court allow "arresting people for attending church"?
Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal
and constitutional law reports that "Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
& Thomas... refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett
pro-lockdown decision":
However, it appears that Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts are in agreement on the "pro-lockdown decision."
Is Barrett another Roberts who will allow "arresting people for attending church"?
On Twitter, WindTalker put it best on the irony of "the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting, looting and... arresting peaceful churchgoers:
WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·
Well,
since
WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·
Well,
since the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting,
looting and mayhem, at least arresting people for attending church gives
“law” enforcement something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful
churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey…
[https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred],
looting and mayhem, at least arresting people for attending church gives
“law” enforce
WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·
Well,
since the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting,
looting and mayhem, at least arresting people for attending church gives
“law” enforcement something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful
churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey…
[https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]ment something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful
churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey…
[Retweet: https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]
Pray an Our Father now for the
restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the
Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal
and constitutional law reports that "Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
& Thomas, that refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett
pro-lockdown decision":
Pray an Our Father now for the
restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the
Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Is this the America Catholics for Barrett want? Barrett's ruling allows "arresting people for attending church."
Is this the America Catholics for Barrett want? Barrett's ruling allows "arresting people for attending church."
WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·
Well, since the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting, looting and mayhem, at least arresting people for attending church gives “law” enforcement something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey… [https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]
Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law exclaimed " Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas, that refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett pro-lockdown decision."
Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law exclaimed " Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas, that refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett pro-lockdown decision."
Fred Martinez is a widely published Catholic writer and former TV broadcaster who has been a pro-life activist, speaker and Board member/adviser with various organisations for many years. In 1985 he founded the Juan Diego Society through which hundreds of babies under threat of abortion were saved.
Praise for Fred Martinez’s The Hidden Axis :
"[T]horough piece of journalism.”- Dale Ahlquist, EWTN host and American Chesterton Society President, "[N]ecessary reading." - Ginny Hitchcock, National pro-life leader and longtime colleague of Fr. Paul Marx, “[A] moral tour de force that is must reading .”- Chuck Morse, radio talk show host, WROL-Boston, "[O]ne incredible, thought-provoking book." - Tony DiGirolamo, Executive Producer of the Culture Shock television show, “[P]rofoundly important." - Dr. Pravin Thevathasan, Catholic Psychologist, “[T]renchant expose.”
Click here for "Hidden Axis":
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref