Is Effeminate Francis's Amoris Laetitia the Mother of the Explicit Francis-Homoheresy and the Implicit Francis-Sex-Abuse Heresy?
Texan Guy McClung of the American Catholic said the effeminate Francis's Amoris Laetitia is the mother of all Francis-heresies including the Francis-homoheresy:
"[T]he evil spawn of the Bergolgian heresies... Bergoglianism are based on the core principles of his exhortation, Amoris Laetitia.
These include: 1. There is no mortal sin, i.e. no sin so grievous
that when the sinner is unrepentant results in the eternal loss of
sanctifying grace; 2. This is true even for those aware of the demands
of the divine law; 3. Divine grace does not make all mortal sins
avoidable; 4. A situation’s circumstances can dismiss one from the
demands of the divine law; 5. Depending on the situation and its
circumstances, God sometimes wills a person to sin; and 6. For those God
judges and who are then sent to hell, hell is not eternal, the fire is
not everlasting; and no one is condemned forever. [see, in addition to
the numerous verbatim quotations from public statements of Jorge
Bergoglio, these sections of his exhortation Amoris Laetitia– 296, 297, 300-303, and 305]..."
"... The homoheresy is this: In certain situations men and women can voluntarally and intentionally engage in homosexual actions and not only are these actions not sinful, they are acts of loving virtue. In these situations, this is God’s will for them. Fully aware of what they are doing, they may continue in their sin, even publically, and be admitted to all the sacraments of the church. God made them this way. No matter what the situation or circumstances, none of these people will ever be condemned forever for engaging in these actions. 'These people' can include married people who and ordained priests, bishops, and cardinals."
"... The homoheresy is this: In certain situations men and women can voluntarally and intentionally engage in homosexual actions and not only are these actions not sinful, they are acts of loving virtue. In these situations, this is God’s will for them. Fully aware of what they are doing, they may continue in their sin, even publically, and be admitted to all the sacraments of the church. God made them this way. No matter what the situation or circumstances, none of these people will ever be condemned forever for engaging in these actions. 'These people' can include married people who and ordained priests, bishops, and cardinals."
McClung didn't say Francis is effeminate, but effeminacy appears to be another "evil spawn of the Bergolgian heresies."
Fatherly passion is what is most needed in the effeminate un-fatherly
Francis Church and that they totally lack this fatherly passion as shown
by Francis's actions as well as the heretical theology of Amoris Laetitia.
Leon J. Podles,
Ph.D., thinks the effeminate church began before Francis with John Paul
II who showed sorrow like Francis, but never behaved like a man with a
heart that was outraged at the evil. He failed to remove sex abusing
high ranking clerics like Fr. Marcial Maciel:
"He [John Paul] publicly apologized for the errors of remote predecessors, but would not apologize for his own errors and the errors of the bishops he had appointed, errors in governing the Church that allowed the abuse to go on." [https://www.google.com/amp/s/billcork.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/review-of-leon-podles-sacrilege-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church/amp/#ampshare=https://billcork.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/review-of-leon-podles-sacrilege-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church/]
Benedict XVI was the last pope to act like a man. He confronted the sex abusers and the bishops who protected them.
He had a heart of a man and true spiritual father when he showed outrage and called them "filth." He removed the sex abuser Fr. Maciel and set up a system to remove predator priests and the bishops who protect them.
Podles shows this is how a true Catholic man and follower of Jesus Christ acts:
"Aquinas, too, says that 'lack of the passion of anger is also a vice' because a man who truly and forcefully rejects evil will be angry at it. The lack of anger makes the movement of the will against evil 'lacking or weak.' He quotes John Chrysostom: 'He who is not angry, whereas he has cause to be, sins. For unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices, it fosters negligence, and incites not only the wicked but the good to do wrong.'” [http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-06-012-v]
Unfortunately, Benedict's fatherly defense of abuse victims was "dismantled" as journalist Hilary White, on January 25, 2017 reported.
Francis "has all but completely dismantled" the "effective" reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict:
"Benedict installed effective procedural reforms on clerical sex abuse; Francis... has all but completely dismantled or reversed those changes... Benedict 'had defrocked or suspended more than 800 priests for past sexual abuse between 2009 and 2012'... His reforms specifically included bishops who refused to act against priest-abusers... 'This Pope has removed two to three bishops per month'... These reforms - and - removals - have ceased entirely under Francis."
(Remnant, "Pope Francis Accused of Inaction in Notorious Sex Abuse Cases, January 25, 2017)
Moreover, Francis has acted even more effeminate than the effeminate Cardinal Bernard Law who is the media face of bishops who protect predator priests. Here is a list:
- Francis accused the victims of calumny. Law did not.
- Francis said he had not received any evidence about the sex abuse case when a member of his inner circle of nine Cardinals and chief adviser on sex abuse personally deliver a letter of evidence to him. Law never did anything close to this.
- A credible victim alleged that the bishop, Francis had defended, not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which in effect is a form of sex abuse. Law never defended any priest who did such things.
- Imagine the outcry that John Paul II would have had if he defended Cardinal Law if a credible victim had alleged that Law had not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which in effect is a form of sex abuse.
- Imagine the outraged that John Paul II would have had if his perfect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Francis's CDF perfect Archbishop Luis Ladaria Ferrer who was protected by Francis's Vatican from going to trial back on April 4, 2017 in France for "complicity in alleged cover-up" of paedophile priest Fr. Bernard Preynat. (Business Standard, "French cardinal, Vatican official to stand trial for paedophile cover-up," September 19, 2017)
- Over "1300 Catholics in Osorno [the diocese where Francis appointed Barros to be bishop], along with 30 diocesan priests, and 120 members of the Chilean Parliament sent a letter to Francis urging him to rescind the appointment of Bishop Barros."((Remnant, "Vatican Watch... So Much for Pope's Child Protection Commission," July 12, 2016). Francis called the Barros protesters "dumb." Law never did anything close to this.
- Francis overturned the Benedict XVI appointed CDF sex abuse ruling to bar Juan Barros from the office of bishop and then appointed him bishop of Osorno. Law never did anything close to this.
- Francis "has all but completely dismantled" the "effective" reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict. Law never did anything close to this.
"He [John Paul] publicly apologized for the errors of remote predecessors, but would not apologize for his own errors and the errors of the bishops he had appointed, errors in governing the Church that allowed the abuse to go on." [https://www.google.com/amp/s/billcork.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/review-of-leon-podles-sacrilege-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church/amp/#ampshare=https://billcork.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/review-of-leon-podles-sacrilege-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church/]
Benedict XVI was the last pope to act like a man. He confronted the sex abusers and the bishops who protected them.
He had a heart of a man and true spiritual father when he showed outrage and called them "filth." He removed the sex abuser Fr. Maciel and set up a system to remove predator priests and the bishops who protect them.
Podles shows this is how a true Catholic man and follower of Jesus Christ acts:
"Aquinas, too, says that 'lack of the passion of anger is also a vice' because a man who truly and forcefully rejects evil will be angry at it. The lack of anger makes the movement of the will against evil 'lacking or weak.' He quotes John Chrysostom: 'He who is not angry, whereas he has cause to be, sins. For unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices, it fosters negligence, and incites not only the wicked but the good to do wrong.'” [http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-06-012-v]
Unfortunately, Benedict's fatherly defense of abuse victims was "dismantled" as journalist Hilary White, on January 25, 2017 reported.
Francis "has all but completely dismantled" the "effective" reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict:
"Benedict installed effective procedural reforms on clerical sex abuse; Francis... has all but completely dismantled or reversed those changes... Benedict 'had defrocked or suspended more than 800 priests for past sexual abuse between 2009 and 2012'... His reforms specifically included bishops who refused to act against priest-abusers... 'This Pope has removed two to three bishops per month'... These reforms - and - removals - have ceased entirely under Francis."
(Remnant, "Pope Francis Accused of Inaction in Notorious Sex Abuse Cases, January 25, 2017)
Moreover, Francis has acted even more effeminate than the effeminate Cardinal Bernard Law who is the media face of bishops who protect predator priests. Here is a list:
- Francis accused the victims of calumny. Law did not.
- Francis said he had not received any evidence about the sex abuse case when a member of his inner circle of nine Cardinals and chief adviser on sex abuse personally deliver a letter of evidence to him. Law never did anything close to this.
- A credible victim alleged that the bishop, Francis had defended, not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which in effect is a form of sex abuse. Law never defended any priest who did such things.
- Imagine the outcry that John Paul II would have had if he defended Cardinal Law if a credible victim had alleged that Law had not only covered-up, but kissed the predator priest and watched the sex abuse which in effect is a form of sex abuse.
- Imagine the outraged that John Paul II would have had if his perfect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who was Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Francis's CDF perfect Archbishop Luis Ladaria Ferrer who was protected by Francis's Vatican from going to trial back on April 4, 2017 in France for "complicity in alleged cover-up" of paedophile priest Fr. Bernard Preynat. (Business Standard, "French cardinal, Vatican official to stand trial for paedophile cover-up," September 19, 2017)
- Over "1300 Catholics in Osorno [the diocese where Francis appointed Barros to be bishop], along with 30 diocesan priests, and 120 members of the Chilean Parliament sent a letter to Francis urging him to rescind the appointment of Bishop Barros."((Remnant, "Vatican Watch... So Much for Pope's Child Protection Commission," July 12, 2016). Francis called the Barros protesters "dumb." Law never did anything close to this.
- Francis overturned the Benedict XVI appointed CDF sex abuse ruling to bar Juan Barros from the office of bishop and then appointed him bishop of Osorno. Law never did anything close to this.
- Francis "has all but completely dismantled" the "effective" reforms instituted against clerical sex abuse by Benedict. Law never did anything close to this.
Effeminacy is the problem because the un-fatherly Francis
is abusing his clerical authority to enable gay sex abusers and not
protect the victims of sex-abuse. So if he is going to call the sex
abuse crisis clericalism then the finger points right at him and his Amoris Laetitia
which is the mother of all Francis-heresies including explicitly
the Francis-homoheresy and implicitly the Francis-sex-abuse heresy.
That Francis and his appointed Vatican consultant gay activist Fr. James Martin, wittingly or unwittingly, are using Amoris Laetitia language to building a bridge from homosexuality to sex-abuse using "Bergoglianism" talking points which can clearly be seen when you substitute the word pedophile for gay or LGBT and other gay activist language as quoted from Martin's World Meeting of Families (WMOF) speech in the Catholic Herald:
- Headline: "Fr. James Martin critiques ['pedophilephobic'] pastors at WMOF"
- "'[W]elcome [pedophile] persons'... into parish life."
- "Don't reduce [pedophile] people to the call to chastity."
-"The priest said those with ['pedophilephobic'] pastors, 'either silently or overtly,' are 'out of luck.'"
-"[L]isten to [pedophile] parishioners;. 'trust that the Holy Spirit will guide them'... rather than 'simply repeating Church teachings without considering their [pedophile] lived experience."
(Catholic Herald, August 23, 2017)
Don't forget Church Militant's September 20, 2017 headline where we substitute pedophile for homosexual:
- "Father Martin: [Pedophiles] not Bound to Chastity"
The point is there is no reason under the sun not to justify pedophile behavior if one uses Martin and Francis language in justifying gay behavior in the Church.
There is no reason not to justify pedophile crimes using Francis/Martin-speak when one substitutes pedophile for gay:
- "Who am I to judge" [pedophiles].
- "God made you like this" [pedophiles].
- That is the "lived experience" of [pedophiles].
- [Pedophile] "discrimination... should be avoided."
That Francis and his appointed Vatican consultant gay activist Fr. James Martin, wittingly or unwittingly, are using Amoris Laetitia language to building a bridge from homosexuality to sex-abuse using "Bergoglianism" talking points which can clearly be seen when you substitute the word pedophile for gay or LGBT and other gay activist language as quoted from Martin's World Meeting of Families (WMOF) speech in the Catholic Herald:
- Headline: "Fr. James Martin critiques ['pedophilephobic'] pastors at WMOF"
- "'[W]elcome [pedophile] persons'... into parish life."
- "Don't reduce [pedophile] people to the call to chastity."
-"The priest said those with ['pedophilephobic'] pastors, 'either silently or overtly,' are 'out of luck.'"
-"[L]isten to [pedophile] parishioners;. 'trust that the Holy Spirit will guide them'... rather than 'simply repeating Church teachings without considering their [pedophile] lived experience."
(Catholic Herald, August 23, 2017)
Don't forget Church Militant's September 20, 2017 headline where we substitute pedophile for homosexual:
- "Father Martin: [Pedophiles] not Bound to Chastity"
The point is there is no reason under the sun not to justify pedophile behavior if one uses Martin and Francis language in justifying gay behavior in the Church.
There is no reason not to justify pedophile crimes using Francis/Martin-speak when one substitutes pedophile for gay:
- "Who am I to judge" [pedophiles].
- "God made you like this" [pedophiles].
- That is the "lived experience" of [pedophiles].
- [Pedophile] "discrimination... should be avoided."
Again, there is no reason under the sun not to justify pedophilia behavior if one uses Francis's Amoris Laetitia language in justifying homosexual behavior in the Church.
What Fr. Z says of Martin applies to Francis and in the long run to pedophilia and gay sex abuse:
"[T]his is part of a larger, concerted effort to normalize sodomy, which is a sin that 'cries to heaven'... Martin's talk is a nightmare of manipulation and misdirection... they use 'lived experience' to justify whatever the hell they want."
(Fr.Z's Blog, "@JamesMartinSJ talk at #WMOF18," August 23, 2018)
The Francis/Martin Amoris Laetitia language "is a nightmare of manipulation and misdirection" that is a bridge to hell.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
"[T]his is part of a larger, concerted effort to normalize sodomy, which is a sin that 'cries to heaven'... Martin's talk is a nightmare of manipulation and misdirection... they use 'lived experience' to justify whatever the hell they want."
(Fr.Z's Blog, "@JamesMartinSJ talk at #WMOF18," August 23, 2018)
The Francis/Martin Amoris Laetitia language "is a nightmare of manipulation and misdirection" that is a bridge to hell.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
posted by Fred Martinez @ 7:28 AM
If he only cries because the children have been abused as Francis did with the Chilean sex abuse victims, but doesn't defend them from the priest sex abusers and the bishops who protect them then he is not acting like a man.
Francis showed he is effeminate by not having a manly and fatherly heart that is outraged by the evil of his spiritual children being sexually abused.
Francis is not behaving like Jesus Christ who declared:
"It were better for him, that a millstone were hanged about his neck and he cast into the sea, than that he should scandalize one of these little ones."
Former federal investigator Leon J. Podles, Ph.D., thinks that the bishops don't behave like Jesus or even like men.
Being amazed at how bishops in the Church are effeminate, Podles wrote:
"Gilbert Kilman, a child psychiatrist, commented, 'What amazes me is the lack of outrage the church feels when its good work is being harmed. So, if there is anything the church needs to know, it needs to know how to be outraged.'"
"Mark Serrano confronted Bishop Frank Rodimer, asking why he had let his priest-friend Peter Osinski sleep with boys at Rodimer’s beach house while Rodimer was in the next bedroom: 'Where is your moral indignation?'”
"Rodimer’s answer was, 'Then I don’t get it. What do you want?' What Serrano wanted Rodimer to do was to behave like a man with a heart, a heart that is outraged by evil. But Rodimer couldn’t; his inability to feel outrage was a quality that had helped make him a bishop. He would never get into fights, never rock the boat, never 'divide' but only 'unify.'” [http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-06-012-v]