Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots
https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/
A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in
ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a
grand scale, for decades.
Mail-in ballots have become the latest flashpoint in the 2020
elections. While President Trump and the GOP warn of widespread
manipulation of the absentee vote that will swell with COVID polling
restrictions, many Democrats and their media allies have dismissed such
concerns as unfounded.
But the political insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity
because he fears prosecution, said fraud is more the rule than the
exception. His dirty work has taken him through the weeds of municipal
and federal elections in Paterson, Atlantic City, Camden, Newark,
Hoboken and Hudson County and his fingerprints can be found in local
legislative, mayoral and congressional races across the Garden State.
Some of the biggest names and highest office holders in New Jersey have
benefited from his tricks, according to campaign records The Post
reviewed.
“An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes — it can make a
difference,” the tipster said. “It could be enough to flip states.”
The whisteblower — whose identity, rap sheet and long history working
as a consultant to various campaigns were confirmed by The Post — says
he not only changed ballots himself over the years, but led teams of
fraudsters and mentored at least 20 operatives in New Jersey, New York
and Pennsylvania — a critical 2020 swing state.
“There is no race in New Jersey — from city council to United States
Senate — that we haven’t worked on,” the tipster said. “I worked on a
fire commissioner’s race in Burlington County. The smaller the race, the
easier it is to do.”
A Bernie Sanders die-hard with no horse in the presidential race, he
said he felt compelled to come forward in the hope that states would act
now to fix the glaring security problems present in mail-in ballots.
“This is a real thing,” he said. “And there is going to be a f–king
war coming November 3rd over this stuff … If they knew how the sausage
was made, they could fix it.”
Mail-in voting can be complicated — tough enough that 84,000 New Yorkers had their mailed votes thrown out in the June 23 Democratic presidential primary for incorrectly filling them out.
But for political pros, they’re a piece of cake. In New Jersey, for
example, it begins with a blank mail-in ballot delivered to a registered
voter in a large envelope. Inside the packet is a return envelope, a
“certificate of mail in voter” which the voter must sign, and the ballot
itself.
That’s when the election-rigger springs into action.
Phony ballots
The ballot has no specific security features — like a stamp or a
watermark — so the insider said he would just make his own ballots.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
But the return envelopes are “more secure than the ballot. You could
never recreate the envelope,” he said. So they had to be collected from
real voters.
He would have his operatives fan out, going house to house,
convincing voters to let them mail completed ballots on their behalf as a
public service. The fraudster and his minions would then take the
sealed envelopes home and hold them over boiling water.
“You have to steam it to loosen the glue,” said the insider.
He then would remove the real ballot, place the counterfeit ballot inside the signed certificate, and reseal the envelope.
“Five minutes per ballot tops,” said the insider.
The insider said he took care not to stuff the fake ballots into just
a few public mailboxes, but sprinkle them around town. That way he
avoided the attention that foiled a sloppy voter-fraud operation in a
Paterson, NJ, city council race this year, where 900 ballots were found
in just three mailboxes.
“If they had spread them in all different mailboxes, nothing would have happened,” the insider said.
Inside jobs
The tipster said sometimes postal employees are in on the scam.
“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in
Bedminster or some Republican stronghold … He can take those
[filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can
just throw those in the garbage.”
In some cases, mail carriers were members of his “work crew,” and
would sift ballots from the mail and hand them over to the operative.
In 2017, more than 500 mail-in ballots in New York City never arrived
to the Board of Elections for races that November — leaving hundreds
disenfranchised. They eventually were discovered in April 2018. “For
some undetermined reason, some baskets of mail that were bound to the
New York City Board of Elections were put off to the side at the
Brooklyn processing facility,” city elections boss Michael Ryan said at
the time of discovery.
Nursing homes
Hitting up assisted-living facilities and “helping” the elderly fill
out their absentee ballots was a gold mine of votes, the insider said.
“There are nursing homes where the nurse is actually a paid
operative. And they go room by room by room to these old people who
still want to feel like they’re relevant,” said the whistleblower.
“[They] literally fill it out for them.”
The insider pointed to former Jersey City Mayor Gerald McCann, who was sued in 2007
after a razor-thin victory for a local school board seat for allegedly
tricking “incompetent … and ill” residents of nursing homes into casting
ballots for him. McCann denied it, though he did admit to assisting
some nursing home residents with absentee ballot applications.
Voter impersonation
When all else failed, the insider would send operatives to vote live
in polling stations, particularly in states like New Jersey and New York
that do not require voter ID. Pennsylvania, also for the most part, does not.
The best targets were registered voters who routinely skip
presidential or municipal elections — information which is publicly
available.
“You fill out these index cards with that person’s name and district
and you go around the city and say, ‘You’re going to be him, you’re
going to be him,'” the insider said of how he dispatched his teams of
dirty-tricksters.
At the polling place, the fake voter would sign in, “get on line and …
vote,” the insider said. The impostors would simply recreate the
signature that already appears in the voter roll as best they could. In
the rare instance that a real voter had already signed in and cast a
ballot, the impersonator would just chalk it up to an innocent mistake
and bolt.
Bribing voters
The tipster said New Jersey homeless shelters offered a nearly inexhaustible pool of reliable — buyable — voters.
“They get to register where they live in and they go to the polls and vote,” he said, laughing at the roughly $174 per vote
Mike Bloomberg spent to win his third mayoral term. He said he could
have delivered the same result at a 70 percent discount — like when
Frank “Pupie” Raia, a real estate developer and Hoboken nabob, was convicted last year on federal charges for paying low-income residents 50 bucks a pop to vote how he wanted during a 2013 municipal election.
Organizationally, the tipster said, his voter-fraud schemes in the
Garden State and elsewhere resembled Mafia organizations, with a boss
(usually the campaign manager) handing off the day-to-day managing of
the mob soldiers to the underboss (him). The actual candidate was
usually kept in the dark deliberately so they could maintain “plausible
deniability.”
With mail-in ballots, partisans from both parties hash out and count
ballots at the local board of elections — debating which ballots make
the cut and which need to be thrown out because of irregularities.
The insider said any ballots offered up by him or his operation would
come with a bent corner along the voter certificate — which contains
the voter signature — so Democratic Board of Election counters would
know the fix was in and not to object.
“It doesn’t stay bent, but you can tell it’s been bent,” the tipster
said. “Until the [certificate] is approved, the ballot doesn’t matter.
They don’t get to see the ballot unless they approve the [certificate.]”
“I invented bending corners,” the insider boasted, saying once the
fixed ballots were mixed in with the normal ones, the bed was made. “Once a ballot is opened, it’s an anonymous ballot.”
While federal law warns of prison sentences of up to five years, busted voter frauds have seen far less punishment. While in 2018 a Texas woman was sentenced to five years, an Arizona man busted for voting twice in the mail was given just three years’ probation. A study by the conservative Heritage Foundation found more than 1,000 instances of documented voter fraud in the United States, almost all of which occurred over the last 20 years.
“There is nothing new about these techniques,” said Hans von
Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at Heritage who manages their election
law reform initiative. “Everything he’s talking about is perfectly
possible.“
The city Board of Elections declined to answer Post questions on ballot security.
Ken Buck doubles down on Rand Paul's call for investigation into funding of violent protests 'The Justice Department needs to open an investigation into who is funding these violent riots'
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ken-buck-and-rand-paul-call-for-investigation-into-funding-of-violent-protests
Ken Buck doubles down on Rand Paul's call for investigation into funding of violent protests
'The Justice Department needs to open an investigation into who is funding these violent riots'
Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., on Sunday called for a Department of Justice
(DOJ) investigation into the funding of recent violent protests that
have sprung up across the country, echoing statements made by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who was recently attacked while with his wife during the Republican National Convention.
"The Justice Department needs to open an investigation into who is funding these violent riots," Buck tweeted.
Buck
had first addressed the issue after Paul and his wife Kelley were
accosted while returning from the RNC, on the way back to their hotel.
"If
the Tea Party threatened a Democratic Senator and assaulted police
officers like this, it would be leading CNN," the Colorado Republican
wrote on Friday. "Every conservative politician would be asked to
condemn it. Where is the outrage?"
Paul commented on the issue in an opinion piece for Fox News published on Saturday.
He revealed some of the protesters were actually staying in the same
hotel -- and on the same floor -- as he and his wife. Some were even as
close as the next room.
"They were talking about their mob
activities and even saying they thought we were here on this floor,"
Paul wrote. "We had to develop a 3 a.m. plan with Capitol Police to get
to safety."
"My
question is: Who are these people?," he continued. "Who paid for their
hotel rooms? Who flew them in? Law enforcement needs to look at the
funding of violent criminal activity like this. And national Democrats
need to confront it. It’s organized. It’s paid for. It’s violent. It’s
not about Black lives or any lives; it’s about anarchy and destruction."
The
GOP senator added, "The American people are starting to catch on and
grow tired of it. So I ask Democratic presidential nominee former Vice
President Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris
this: Will you stand up finally and denounce this violence and
destruction? Will you quit inciting it and urge other leaders to do the
same?"
Paul's wife also penned an op-ed -- for the Washington Examiner -- describing the events as the basis for "a terrifying dystopian novel."
"The mob swarmed me and my husband,
Sen. Rand Paul, in a tight circle, screaming expletives, threats, and
shouting, 'Say her name,'" Kelley wrote. "We rushed up to two police
officers, and I believe that is the only thing that kept us from being knocked to the ground. Even pressed against the officers, we were greatly outnumbered."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
She
then accused The Associated Press of misrepresenting her husband's
account of the attack and said it was absurd of the media outlet to say
Paul lacked evidence or proof, to back up his story.
"The Associated Press is
reporting that Rand used the word 'attack' to describe our ordeal
'without evidence,'" Kelley added, "This is disgusting and utter proof
of their bias. When you are surrounded by throngs of people screaming in
your face and preventing you from getting away, that is an attack."
Don’t Believe the Lies: Church Services, Done Correctly, Are Safe
https://www.complicitclergy.com/2020/08/31/dont-believe-the-lies-church-services-done-correctly-are-safe/
Scientists told us that church services during the coronavirus pandemic are “a dangerous environment.” They said we couldn’t go to church, or we would risk killing our elderly neighbors.
That was likely true until we learned to wear masks and social
distance. Now the evidence suggests that it is highly unlikely for the
virus to spread during church services when safety practices are in
place.
But even though the danger of infection at church services has
dissipated, many governors continue to force churches to operate at a
capacity well below a level where social distancing can be maintained.
Continue reading at the American Spectator
The Face Of The Democratic Party Isn’t Joe Biden, It’s The Raging Mob
The unfolding disaster for Democrats right now, with just 63 days
until the election, is that their party’s brand is not Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris, it’s the violent mob in the streets.
Democrats have only themselves to blame. Too many months of inaction
and equivocation about “mostly peaceful protests” have branded them as
the party that’s okay with street violence and mob action, as long as
it’s in the name of racial justice.
It doesn’t matter what Biden says now. His earlier caveated condemnations of rioting and looting, and his weak statement on the shooting in Portland that
blamed the violence on Trump, are too little, too late. And anyway, no
one believes him. Instead, the images coming out of Kenosha and Portland
and Washington, D.C., have spoken for him. What these images say, loud
and clear, is that Democrats think rioting and looting and violence are
okay, under the circumstances.
No wonder the Democratic National Convention was conspicuously silent
about the riots earlier this month. They know — as we all do — that
many of those rioting are part of the Democratic Party’s left-wing base.
Biden isn’t about to denounce them. He needs all those suburban white
women we’ve seen screaming in the face of cops to show up and show up
big, on election day.
The recent conventions were instructive in this regard. Most
Americans don’t pay much attention to them (ratings for both the RNC and
DNC were dismal),
but they do seem to be paying attention to the mobs burning down
businesses in middle America and accosting people in the streets of
Washington, D.C.
For all the pageantry that went into the RNC last week, the images
most people will remember will not be President Trump on a stage or the
fireworks above the White House. It will be the angry horde pounding on
the White House gates and the raging mobs that followed conventiongoers
through the streets, screaming in their faces, harassing them, striking
one old man in the face, and threatening Sen. Rand Paul and his wife.
Everyone — even The New York Times and The Atlantic, which have been starting to sound the alarm —
knows these mobs belong to the Democratic Party. That’s one reason the
mainstream media have released no battleground state polls, zero, since
the Kenosha riots began on August 23. Given that a Zogby poll
last week showed Trump with a 52 percent approval rating, a new high,
one can surmise that major media polls right now are showing a decisive
shift in Trump’s favor, which is why they’re not releasing them.
Some Democrats — not those in national leadership, but some— get it.
Earlier this month, Tennessee state Rep. John DeBerry, Jr., gave a powerful speech
in the Tennessee General Assembly denouncing the riots and violence and
contrasting today’s political unrest with the peaceful civil rights
marches he participated in as a child with his father and Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. “What we see happening right now, any of us with any
common sense, any common sense whatsoever, know that what we see is not
peaceful,” he said.
DeBerry is a good example of Democrats’ current predicament. Being
pro-life and pro-school choice, he’s not the kind of Democrat the party
wants anymore. DeBerry represented a Memphis state House district as a
Democrat for 26 years, but in April he was kicked off his party’s primary ballot
because he wasn’t “exemplifying the basic Democratic principles,”
according to party leaders in Memphis, and will now be running as an
independent in the November elections.
Other old-school liberal Democrats are sounding the same warning. Last week Andrew Sullivan described Democrats as walking into a trap
as the election devolves into a contest over which party cares about
maintaining order and upholding the law. “If one party supports
everything I believe in but doesn’t believe in maintaining law and order
all the time and everywhere, I’ll back a party that does,” Sullivan
wrote. “In that sense, I’m a one-issue voter, because, without order,
there is no room for any other issue.”
This
isn’t hard to understand, and in a way, it’s amazing that Democrats
have painted themselves into a corner like this. Most people hate
looting, rioting, and really mob action of any kind. Any time a person
in a position of power appears to equivocate or excuse these things, it
makes people hate them even more — and despise leaders who won’t put an
end to it, by force if necessary.
Yet this is precisely what Democrats have been courting since before
nationwide riots broke out in May over the death of George Floyd in
police custody. Two years ago at a rally protesting Trump’s border
policies, Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters declared that God was “on our
side” and called on Democrats to harass members of the Trump administration wherever they could be found.
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” she said.
“And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a
department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a
crowd. You push back on them. Tell them they’re not welcome anymore,
anywhere.”
Here’s what that looks like in real life:
If Biden and the Democrats had any sense of what is happening to them
right now, they would come out in force and denounce the rioters and
looters and condemn the mobs in the streets in unequivocal terms. They
would force Waters to retract her June 2018 remarks about harassing
Trump officials and enforce a similar discipline on Democratic elected
officials across the country who encourage, however tacitly, mob
harassment of anyone, Trump official or not.
But they won’t do this for the simple reason that they need those
mobs to vote for Biden in November. The mob, in other words, is now a
core Democratic constituency. Wouldn’t want to alienate them.
More on the Covid Fraud
https://dad29.blogspot.com/2020/08/more-on-covid-fraud.html
More on the Covid Fraud
Chris Ferrara, who will shortly be a household name in Madison-area Catholic households, did a little analysis of the CDC's recent re-working of Covid numbers.
It ain't good for the Covid-Porn industry, nor for the Tin-Pot crowd of bureaucrats, dweebs, and ninny-Governors.
...According to the CDC, as of August 27, 165,946 deaths have been
attributed to COVID-19. But are they really COVID-19 deaths—that is,
deaths caused by that virus and not something else? Or have they merely
been counted as COVID deaths when the real cause of death was not COVID?
If the latter is the case, Americans have been the victims of a massive
scientific fraud.
The CDC’s own chart of the “provisional death count” presents evidence of fraud in plain sight....
How so?
... first of all, the column header above the total of 165,946 supposedly COVID-caused deaths to date: “All Deaths Involving COVID-19”. Involving? Not quite the same as “caused by,” is it?...
No it's not. Not at all.
...Notice the column header “Deaths Involving Pneumonia, with or without COVID-19.” Here, an article by Life Site News
has cracked the case wide open. The author, Robert L. Kinney, III,
notes that the primary cause of death when death is caused by COVID-19
is viral pneumonia, resulting from the virus invading lung
tissue, which also presents as “acute respiratory distress syndrome”
(ARDS) resulting from lung tissue inflammation by the virus.
Now, by lumping together all pneumonia deaths, with or
without COVID-19, the CDC makes it impossible to determine how many
pneumonia deaths were the result of COVID-19 infiltrating the lungs,
without which COVID-19 would not be the cause of death in the vast
majority of cases (putting aside some evidence that the virus causes
kidney and cardiac damage) — because without pneumonia or ARDS, the mere
presence of COVID-19 is generally not lethal....
Oh. You mean that CDC may have been cooking the books?
...Now, move over to the column headed by “Deaths Involving COVID-19 and Pneumonia excluding influenza.”
Those deaths would have been caused by COVID-19 because it was COVID —
not influenza — that caused the fatal pneumonia. And what is the total
number of deaths in that column. Why, it’s only 73,398—a total no higher
than what we see during a very bad flu season.
As for deaths by ARDS, Kinney notes that the CDC admits that, as of
August 27, only 21,054 death certificates list ARDS as a complication of
COVID-19. Take the two numbers rounded down together—73,000 COVID
pneumonia deaths and 21,000 COVID ARDS deaths—and you have a total of
94,000 deaths, not 165,000 deaths, that were arguably caused by
COVID-19....
*Scritch scratch scritch......* A FORTY PERCENT REDUCTION. You don't have to take statistics to know that FORTY PERCENT is statistically significant.
Oh Hell No, it doesn't end there!!
...The CDC’s “Provisional Death Count” page further admits that the entire array of COVID death statistics has been fatally compromised
by a new code for such deaths that permits a death to be counted as a
COVID death when COVID “is listed as a ‘probable’ or ‘presumed’ cause …
with or without laboratory confirmation.” That is, any number
of reported COVID-19 deaths may never have involved the virus at all,
but merely someone’s educated guess that COVID-19 was in the victim’s
system.
Thus, we will never know how many people have actually died from
COVID-19, because even when COVID is paired with pneumonia, as shown
above—producing 73,000 deaths— or with ARDS—producing 21,000 deaths—we
have no way of knowing whether the COVID part was confirmed by testing.
Those deaths could have been the result of influenza A or B that was
merely “presumed” to be COVID without testing to confirm it....
Or,
as was the case in Florida, the motorcyclist who hit a tree and died,
well, his death was adjusted to become "Covid." In another state,
someone who was thoroughly ventilated by high-speed lead was also a
"Covid death."
C'mon, maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!!
These bureaucrats
need their jobs, maaaaaaaaaaaaaan!! Without Covid-Porn, we wouldn't need them at all.
How would the Deep State persevere then??
Life Site News Exposes the COVID Con
https://fatima.org/news-views/life-site-news-exposes-the-covid-con/
Life Site News Exposes the COVID Con
by Chris Ferrara
I’ve been on hiatus from this column over the past two weeks due to my work as Special Counsel for the amazing Thomas More Society.
I am focusing at the moment on COVID-19 litigation against tyrannical
governors who have used the virus as a pretext to install themselves as
absolute monarchs in their respective states, with the courts largely—but not entirely, as one case I handled shows — catering to their absolute monarchies.
The COVID-19 dictatorship is not just an American problem. All of
Western Europe and places as far away as Australia are under
soul-afflicting and commerce-destroying lockdowns of varying degrees,
along with preposterous “social distancing” mandates that require every
citizen to remain six feet away from every other citizen while wearing
ridiculous pieces of cloth on their faces. This madness has, in a few
short months, radically altered the social fabric and provided the
matrix for a “global reset” that, of course, has the full support of the current occupant of the Chair of Peter,
who presides over what has to be the final stage of the “apostasy that
begins at the top,” to recall the words of Cardinal Ciappi in reference
to the integral Third Secret of Fatima.
Now, in the United States the panic narrative that has provided a
pretext for the COVID-19 dictatorships is derived in large part from the
“Provisional Death Count”
continually updated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). According
to the CDC, as of August 27, 165,946 deaths have been attributed to
COVID-19. But are they really COVID-19 deaths—that is, deaths caused by
that virus and not something else? Or have they merely been counted as
COVID deaths when the real cause of death was not COVID? If the latter
is the case, Americans have been the victims of a massive scientific
fraud.
The CDC’s own chart of the “provisional death count” presents
evidence of fraud in plain sight. Look closely at the column headers:
Notice, first of all, the column header above the total of 165,946 supposedly COVID-caused deaths to date: “All Deaths Involving
COVID-19”. Involving? Not quite the same as “caused by,” is it?
Immediately, the entire statistic is suspect based on the CDC’s own
chart.
But it gets worse. Notice the column header “Deaths Involving Pneumonia, with or without COVID-19.” Here, an article by Life Site News
has cracked the case wide open. The author, Robert L. Kinney, III,
notes that the primary cause of death when death is caused by COVID-19
is viral pneumonia, resulting from the virus invading lung
tissue, which also presents as “acute respiratory distress syndrome”
(ARDS) resulting from lung tissue inflammation by the virus.
Now, by lumping together all pneumonia deaths, with or
without COVID-19, the CDC makes it impossible to determine how many
pneumonia deaths were the result of COVID-19 infiltrating the lungs,
without which COVID-19 would not be the cause of death in the vast
majority of cases (putting aside some evidence that the virus causes
kidney and cardiac damage) — because without pneumonia or ARDS, the mere
presence of COVID-19 is generally not lethal. The virus does not kill
in itself, like cancer does.
Now, move over to the column headed by “Deaths Involving COVID-19 and Pneumonia excluding influenza.”
Those deaths would have been caused by COVID-19 because it was COVID —
not influenza — that caused the fatal pneumonia. And what is the total
number of deaths in that column. Why, it’s only 73,398—a total no higher
than what we see during a very bad flu season.
As for deaths by ARDS, Kinney notes that the CDC admits that, as of
August 27, only 21,054 death certificates list ARDS as a complication of
COVID-19. Take the two numbers rounded down together—73,000 COVID
pneumonia deaths and 21,000 COVID ARDS deaths—and you have a total of
94,000 deaths, not 165,000 deaths, that were arguably caused by
COVID-19.
But the con job does not end there. The CDC’s “Provisional Death Count” page further admits that the entire array of COVID death statistics has been fatally compromised
by a new code for such deaths that permits a death to be counted as a
COVID death when COVID “is listed as a ‘probable’ or ‘presumed’ cause …
with or without laboratory confirmation.” That is, any number
of reported COVID-19 deaths may never have involved the virus at all,
but merely someone’s educated guess that COVID-19 was in the victim’s
system.
Thus, we will never know how many people have actually died from
COVID-19, because even when COVID is paired with pneumonia, as shown
above—producing 73,000 deaths— or with ARDS—producing 21,000 deaths—we
have no way of knowing whether the COVID part was confirmed by testing.
Those deaths could have been the result of influenza A or B that was
merely “presumed” to be COVID without testing to confirm it.
And, indeed, the CDC further bamboozles us by lumping influenza,
pneumonia and COVID deaths together in the final column of the chart to
arrive at the number 268,718, making it impossible to separate out flu
deaths from COVID deaths.
The deception goes even deeper. Even if the presence of COVID-19 in a decedent was
confirmed by laboratory testing, we still don’t know if the virus was
the actual cause of death as opposed to a preexisting comorbidity such
as cancer or heart disease. On April 8, 2020, Dr. Deborah Birx acknowledged that all deaths of patients who die “with” coronavirus in their systems would be classified as “COVID-19” deaths regardless of the actual cause of death.
We have been well and truly had. And the COVID con has been the means
by which, almost overnight, pop-up dictatorships have taken possession
of our rights, banned our worship, and ordered us to live in six-foot
bubble zones behind useless “face coverings.”
Does anyone detect the distinct order of sulfur in all of this? I do, and I have a lousy sense of smell.
CDC now says 94% of COVID deaths had an underlying condition, only 6% were COVID alone
https://www.wnd.com/2020/08/cdc-nows-says-94-covid-deaths-underlying-condition-6-covid-alone/
CDC now says 94% of COVID deaths had an underlying condition, only 6% were COVID alone
A new report from the federal
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that in 94 percent of
the cases of those who died from COVID-19, another disease was also at
work on the victim.
"For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned," the CDC stated in its report, under the heading "Comoborbities."
"For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on
average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death," the
report continued.
The report
showed that in 18,116 of 42,587 deaths in the 75-84 age group, the
individual who died also had the flu or pneumonia, while in 15,100 cases
the underlying condition was respiratory failure.
Overall, of the 161, 392 deaths covered by the report, 42 percent
(68,004) of those who died also had the flu or pneumonia while 34
percent (54,803) had an underlying condition of respiratory failure.
TRENDING: Biden misunderstands, mistakes identities, misrepresents all in 1 quote
Duration 0:31
Current Time 0:14
Diabetes was an underlying condition in 16 percent of the deaths
(25,936 people) while various heart-related conditions including cardiac
arrest, ischemic heart disease (also known as hardening of the
arteries), cardiac arrhythmia and heart disease (58,687 people) were
found in 36 percent of those who died.
In June, the CDC listed as high-risk individuals for COVID-19
those who had chronic kidney disease; COPD (chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease); obesity (BMI of 30 or higher); immunocompromised
state (weakened immune system) from solid organ transplant; serious
heart conditions, such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or
cardiomyopathies; sickle cell disease; Type 2 diabetes.
Has the government been lying to you for months about COVID figures?
Although the CDC's initial guidance suggested those over 65 were at
high risk, the CDC later revised that to note than risk increases with
age and that there is no single age at which risk suddenly rises.
In comments released at the time, CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said risk "is a continuum."
"Based on what we’ve learned, we now understand that as you get
older, your risk for severe disease, hospitalization, and death
increases. We also updated the list of underlying health conditions
that can put you at higher risk for severe disease, hospitalization, and
death, based on the latest review of scientific evidence to date," he
said.
"A key point is that we want to make sure that people know that as
your numbers of underlying medical conditions increase, your risk of
severe illness from COVID also increases," he said.
As of Sunday afternoon, the coronavirus had infected almost 6 million Americans, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, and roughly 25 million worldwide.
As of Sunday, 843,826 people had been reported as killed by the virus, with 182,909 of those being Americans.
Spread of the disease resulted in mass lockdowns across the country.
Risk is one of the factors that will go into distributing COVID-19
vaccines once those that are now in trials are ready for the market,
according to CNBC.
“At first, there will likely be a limited supply of one or more of
the Covid-19 vaccines, because limited doses will be available,”
Redfield said Friday, CNBC reported. “It’s important that the early
vaccines are distributed in a fair, ethical and transparent way.”
The list of those to be vaccinated will include health care workers,
those considered essential workers at the time a vaccine is ready for
distribution, and those considered at high risk due to age and
underlying health conditions, according to the CDC.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
Why Europe is Dying and Why the US is Next?
Please read Paul Cameron's letter below to see why as the US continues along the Gay agenda we are not far behind Europe:
Traditionally,
good citizens did three things:1) produced more stuff than they
consumed.2) obeyed laws and customs.3) raised children in marriage.
An
ever-growing fraction of citizens are choosing not to have children,
thereby ‘leaching’ off the efforts of those who do. Among this fraction,
homosexuals stand out.
Winning social approval in spite their
sexual activity, they gain an important exemption – they don’t have to
do the hard work of producing and raising children because they just
don’t feel like it . They would rather follow their sexual desires, or
pursue alternatives open to the unencumbered.
Homosexuals participate in and reinforce the notion that sexuality is primarily, if not exclusively, recreational.
They
exemplify the ‘childless by choice,’ and as such, constitute both an
index and a cause of childlessness. An index because the proportion of
those never-married aged 30-34 has gone up from less than 8% in 1970 to
28% today. A cause, because many reason, even if subconsciously -- ‘if
gays can be good citizens without holding up their part of the sky, why
should I?”
Homosexuals strain society in a number of ways. While
they are healthy they contribute less to the production of stuff because
they miss work more frequently. And, because their lifespans are
reduced by about 20 years, they tend not to put in a full work career
(which is 35 years in the U.S.) either.
But homosexuality is
worse still. Besides not contributing their full measure of stuff, they
also siphon extra stuff from society. Gays, in particular, are subject
to a number of extravagantly expensive diseases.
Take just one --
HIV infection. Currently, our society spends about 100 billion
dollars/year on the ‘prevention,’ cure, and care of those suffering from
HIV.
Gays account for about 60% of HIV expenditures. Why?
Because HIV doesn’t fall off trees or lurk on toilet seats -- you
usually get HIV by engaging in ‘gay delight’ -- penile-rectal sex. Gays
and lesbians also get a host of other STDs – many of which are costly
due to the need for blood transfusions, medicines, or hospitalizations.
All
this, and their activities don’t produce children! It’s hard to
definitively quantify just how much extra homosexuals cost society. But
it is unlikely that they average less than an extra $15,000/year apiece.
The Centers for Disease Control has figured out that people who smoke
cost an extra $168 billion a year – given 22 million smokers, an average
of $3,700 per smoker.
But smokers have almost the same number of
kids as non-smokers. So while smokers cost society more than
non-smokers, their overall contribution is substantial. As a group,
smokers are a net gain for society.
The same cannot be said of
homosexuals (or IV drug abusers), they are a net loss. Homosexuals
create yet another social cost – and it is a large one. They
disproportionately sexually involve themselves with the underage.
For
instance, when it comes to foster parents, about a third of the
substantiated cases of foster child sexual abuse are committed by
homosexuals.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/118/
1/349
Between a quarter and a third of teacher-pupil molestations
are homosexual (P Cameron, K Cameron, Do Homosexual Teachers Pose a
Risk to Pupils? Journal of Psychology 1996;130:603-613).
Elton
John is a not only a moocher, he is a spoiled brat moocher who
deliberately tries to further harm society. As a merchant of death, he
richly deserves opprobrium. In the present demographic crisis, where
Europe is dying before our very eyes in large part due to the philosophy
he espouses, he deserves worse than opprobrium.
Paul Cameron, Ph.D. Chairman, Family Research Institute Colorado Springs, CO303 681 3113
Click here for Credit Card and Amazon Order of Fred Martinez's book "Hidden Axis":
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as
well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and
the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Whistleblower: Mail-in voter fraud is easy to pull off, we’ve been doing it for years
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/whistleblower-warns-america-mail-in-voter-fraud-is-easy-to-pull-off-weve-been-doing-it-for-years-op-ed/
The editorial reflections in this are brought to you by a
former Chief of Police and current staff writer for Law Enforcement
Today.
—
NEW YORK- Make no mistake about it…the reason
Democrats are pushing mail-in ballots so hard is that they want to
create chaos on November 3.
It is a win-win for them if you think about it. If President Trump wins, the Democrats can claim he suppressed the vote.
If President Trump loses and questions the process, which he might if
it is close, the Democrats can claim he’s “refusing to accept the will
of the American people.”
See how that works?
Democrats claim that there is no possibility of voter fraud with mail-in ballots. However, a report in the New York Post
offers a cautionary tale about the widespread use of mail-in ballots,
with a Democratic operative saying that voter fraud is no myth, in
particular concerning mail-in ballots.
How does he know? Because he’s done it…frequently.
The source, who would only speak to the Post on condition of anonymity for fear of prosecution, said that voter fraud is “more the rule than the exception,” the Post said.
In this case, the man worked on
municipal and federal elections in New Jersey, including in Paterson,
Atlantic City, Camden, and others. He has meddled in local legislative
races, mayoral contests, and congressional contests across the state.
The Post said that according to records they reviewed, those
who benefited from his interference include some of the “biggest names
and highest office holders” in the state.
The insider noted that, “An election that is
swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes—it can make a difference. It could be
enough to flip states.”
Think about it…1,000 votes could be the difference in a congressional
race, and with only a handful of seats needed to flip the House from
Democrat back to Republican control, the stakes have never been higher.
If four Senate seats change hands from Republican to Democrat, they
gain control of the Senate. While it has been said this is the most
important election of our lifetimes on a presidential scale, the stakes
are also high in the under ticket.
The whistleblower told the Post that he personally changed
ballots himself over the years, but actually led teams of individuals
and had personally mentored at least 20 people in New Jersey, New York,
and Pennsylvania.
His identity, rap sheet and history working as a consultant to numerous campaigns was confirmed by the paper.
He told the Post that he worked on every type of political
race in New Jersey—from city council up to the United States Senate—and
that the “smaller the race the easier it is to do.”
The whistleblower said that he is a Bernie Sanders supporter and
doesn’t care who wins the presidential race, however he believed he
needed to come forward in order to address what he said are significant
problems with mail-in ballots.
“This is a real thing,” he lamented, saying that there will be a “fucking war coming November 3rd over this stuff.”
He said that the problem is easily fixable if they “knew how the sausage is made.”
According to the Post, 84,000 voters
in New York had their ballots invalidated for the June 23 Democratic
presidential primary due to their being improperly filled out.
While claiming that mail-in voting can be complicated, the
whistleblower said that for people who possessed the proper acumen, the
process is easy to figure out and easy to rig.
He noted that in the case of New
Jersey, a blank mail-in ballot is delivered to a registered voter in a
large envelope, with a return envelope inside, a “certificate of mail-in
voter” that must be signed by the voter, and then the ballot itself.
This was when the person looking to rig the ballot goes to work.
He said that ballots have no security features such as stamps or watermarks, which makes them easy to counterfeit. Simply run the ballot “through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” he said.
The return envelopes presented a larger problem, since they are “more
secure than the ballot. “You could never recreate the envelope,” he
said.
The solution? Get them from real voters.
This is where ballot harvesting comes in, or at least a version of
it. In this case, the operative would send people out going
door-to-door, talking voters to let them mail completed ballots as a
“public service.”
Then, it was just a matter of taking the sealed envelopes and holding
them over steam to loosen the glue. The legitimate ballot would then be
removed, and the counterfeit ballot placed inside.
Time taken? “Five minutes per ballot tops,” he said.
The fake ballots weren’t all placed
in just a limited number of public mailboxes but were placed in various
mailboxes around town.
This was done in order to avoid a similar situation that happened in
Paterson, N.J. in a city council race this year, where 900 ballots were
placed in only three mailboxes.
He said in that case, the fraudsters made the mistake by not
spreading them around the city, saying if they had done so, “nothing
would have happened.”
So, in the case of this year’s election, the postal union has
endorsed Joe Biden in the presidential election. Clearly post-office
employees would not possibly interfere in an election, would they?
Wrong.
According to our whistleblower, postal employees are sometimes in on the scam as well.
“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy
and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold…He can
take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a
Republican he can just throw those in the garbage.”
He noted that in some cases, he actually had mail carriers as part of
his “work crew,” and would grab ballots from the mail and send them
over to the operative.
The Post said that in 2017
more than 500 mail-in ballots in New York City never made it to the
Board of Elections for elections that November. This led to hundreds of
people not having the ability to vote. It took months for the ballots to
be found, finally being discovered in April 2018.
Where were they found? They were apparently “put off to the side at
the Brooklyn processing facility,” according to city elections
supervisor Michael Ryan.
The whistleblower also identified nursing homes and assisted living
facilities as good marks for voter fraud as well, where people will
“help” elderly voters fill out their absentee ballots.
Do
you want to join our private family of first responders and
supporters? Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful
stories that the media refuses to show you. Proceeds get reinvested
into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and
supporters tell more of these stories. Click to check it out.
Join Bishop Gracida's Resistance & Watch his YouTube Interview
Watch "Bishop Gracida Exclusive Interview—Lay Uprising" on YouTube:
"Cardinal Burke is saying... the truth. What is more important... is for people in the pew to say:
No, that is not true!"
"It's more important for people in the pew to raise up and say in
print, in letters, in phone calls, in email, in person, in interviews...
for the laity to say no that is not true... than for a Burke to say
this is the truth...."
"We don't need people to say this is the truth. What we need in the present moment is for the laity to say that is not true..."
"Just like in the fourth century when those people shouted down Arius.
No, you're wrong. He is Divine... That is what we have to do today... We
have to have people stand up to the homilist, priests and bishops...
No, you're wrong."
"You cannot give Holy Communion to the
abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce
and remarried. You cannot do it. St. Paul said you do not feed the
Eucharist to dogs..."
"Right now they [the laity] are suffering
in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that
common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching
of the Church which is the foundation of their faith."
"Having
accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the
magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse
that causes them to speak out and say no:
That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"
"Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! Object!"
(Church Militant video, "Laity, Rise Up!," April 4, 2017)
Almost all the faithful orthodox Catholic bishops and cardinals, it
appears, are too cowardly to join the sensus fidilium lay resistance
against the heresy of sacrilege Communion to adulterous couples promoted
by Amoris Laetitia except a very few exceptions.
The one obvious exception is Bishop Rene Henry Gracida.
Bishop Gracida and theologian Dr. John R. T. Lamont, Pd. D. show us what
to do to resist the Amoris Laetitia heresy. Lamont gives an overview of
the crisis, shows what needs to be done and points to Gracida as a
leader in the resistance:
"The AAS statement thus settles an important and much-debated question. It establishes that Pope Francis in
Amoris laetitia
has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense; that
is, propositions that contradict truths that are divinely revealed and
that must be believed with the assent of faith."
"It has not only established this; it has made it a religious duty for
Catholics to believe that this is the case. Pope Francis is the Pope,
and as such he has the power to exercise the papal teaching authority
within the limits set to that authority by divine law. In the AAS
statement, he has required Catholics to give religious assent of mind
and will to the assertion that
Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical..."
"...It would be wrong however to think that Pope Francis is the worst
scourge afflicting the Church. The election of a bad man as Pope can
never be entirely ruled out. In a healthy Church the problem of a
heretical Pope can and will be dealt with by the Catholic bishops, just
as the immune system of a healthy body will react to disease and
eradicate it. The immune system of the Church at the present is not
operating. The bishops of the Catholic Church have remained silent about
the heresy in
Amoris laetitia, and have thereby abandoned the faithful."
"The heretical statements of
Amoris laetitia have not been
presented to the faithful as something that they can take or leave. Pope
Francis has stated in official magisterial documents that they are
papal teachings that they must accept. He has been supported in this by a
large number of bishops. Pope Francis has thereby put pressure on all
the Catholic faithful to reject divinely revealed truth."
"The faithful are not protected against this pressure by the bishops of
Kazakhstan, or elsewhere, issuing a statement upholding the truths that
Francis is denying. When encountering a difference of opinion between a
papal document and a letter from a handful of Kazakh bishops, the
faithful will naturally take the papal statement to be of higher
authority."
"In order to protect the faithful from the attack on their belief and salvation that is being made through
Amoris laetitia,
it is necessary to address the falsehoods in that document itself, and
to condemn them by appealing to an authority that justifies the
rejection of a non-infallible papal letter; the authority of divine
revelation expressed in the Scriptures and repeated by the magisterium
of the Church."
"This appeal does not have to be a canonical warning to Pope Francis
that could serve as the first step in his deposition. Such a canonical
warning would have to be addressed to the Pope himself, and warn him of
the nature of his crime and the consequences of persisting in it. It
would be sufficient to take the lesser step of simply addressing the
faithful to condemn
Amoris laetitia as heretical.
Aside from Bishops Bernard Fellay and Henry Gracida, no Catholic bishops have done this." [
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/02/important-guest-essay-meaning-of-amoris.html?m=1]
Bishop Emeritus of Corpus Christi, Rene Henry Gracida said:
"Cardinal Burke is saying... the truth. What is more important... is for people in the pew to say:
No, that is not true!"
"It's more important for people in the pew to raise up and say in print,
in letters, in phone calls, in email, in person, in interviews... for
the laity to say no that is not true... than for a Burke to say this is
the truth...."
"We don't need people to say this is the truth. What we need in the present moment is for the laity to say that is not true..."
"Just like in the fourth century when those people shouted down Arius.
No, you're wrong. He is Divine... That is what we have to do today... We
have to have people stand up to the homilist, priests and bishops...
No, you're wrong."
"You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion
promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it.
St. Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs..."
"Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to
object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the
laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is
the foundation of their faith."
"Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to
the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse
that causes them to speak out and say no:
That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"
"Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! Object!"
(Church Militant video, "Laity, Rise Up!," April 4, 2017)
Bishop Gracida leads by example when he says: Speak up! Resist! Object!
On December 2, 2017, Gracida on his official website declared Francis is teaching heresy:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the
Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters
magisterial documents."
Whether he acknowledges it or not, Bishop Gracida became our St.
Athanasius (who lead the resistance against the Arian heresy in the
fourth century) when he explicitly said Amoris Laetitia is heretical and
said to resist sacrilege Communions.
Where do we go from here to join Bishop Gracida's resistance?
Bloggers and all faithful orthodox Catholic laity need a coordinated organized plan at all levels.
That gets us to the brass tacks.
You, who are reading this post right now, are one of the persons who
God, Jesus Christ, is calling to defend his Bride, the Church:
First pray and ask God what He wants you to do.
Next, pray, fast and offer up your sacrifices and sufferings for the restoration of the Church.
Then do what you can do within your capacity and within your duties of life which God has called you to.
If all you can honestly do is pray and offer up your sufferings and sacrifices then do that.
That you are articulate or not doesn't matter. Talk to those closest to you and others.
If you can write then write for the restoration.
Have you the skills and media savvy to engage the media? Then use those skills to defend the Church in this crisis.
If your a leader then lead those who follow you and coordinate with other leaders to help restore the Bride of Christ.
When you accept God's call to defend the Church, then you need to do
some deep praying at Mass and if possible in front of the Blessed
Sacrament before starting.
I recommend that you start praying, everyday, the Auxiliarum
Christianorum prayers put together by exorcists for your spiritual
protection.
If you are a leader or media savvy person coordinating with others in
this battle to defend the Bride of Christ then you need to find at least
one or two advisers, priests or deeply spiritual smart persons, who you
can trust and openly discuss things as they unfold.
If you're are a priest then you need to do the above and offer Masses for the restoration.
This is the time to pray and act.
Francis appears to be increasingly isolated even in the Vatican.
We, the resistance, are haunting Francis and his inner circle's minds.
That is why they were recently staging those events against us and putting out Gaudete et Exsultate suddenly.
They are clever and are not shy about using their papal and media power.
But, when it comes to intelligence, they are inferior. Over and over
again they are being bested.
Their only chance is to keep the façade going that there is even the
slightest chance that what they are promoting and teaching is not
contrary to everything the Church has always taught infallibly.
If by the grace of God some how we can get a majority or a large segment
of good unintellectual average sincere Catholics in the pews and in the
bishop chairs to turn away from their idolatry that popes are always
right and to be obeyed even if they are promoting sin and sacrilege then
that could by God's grace be the tipping point in this battle.
No matter what happens in the immediate future or in our lifetime, we
must do all for God in peace knowing eventually the Church will be
restored.
God, and those who are with Him, always wins.
Those who resist God always lose.
That is why there is a heaven and hell as well as a last judgment.
You, dear reader, are in my prayers.
Pray an Our Father now that God give you the grace to do what He is
calling you to do and for the conversion of those resisting God's will.
&media=https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Screen-Shot-2020-08-16-at-3.12.18-PM-150x98.png){kind=link}